I am reasonably sure that I do things that other people find annoying.
I can’t tell you what they are. Because if I knew what they were, I
think I would make an effort not to do them. Which mean this: those annoying things I do? I’m not aware of them.
Emoticons and exclamation points, I find ... annoying. I say that with some trepidation because people that I love, people that I think highly of, people who I know would lend me a hand if I were down, use one or -- !!!! -- both of these in communication.
If it weren’t for email or Facebook (Twitter seems curiously immune to these two habits), I wouldn’t know this. I could go through life, running into these folks, and be blissfully unaware they were typographical terrorists.
Just a guess here, but I’m pretty sure one of the world’s great advances was when the alphabet replaced pictures. When, instead of painstakingly drawing a picture of your dog, you could just write: “my DOG is dead.” Oh, and by the way, an unhappy smiley face would not make me feel any better about this.
Also, I’m not crazy about reading things that
move. Moveable type was an enormous leap ahead for Western civilization. But the wonderful thing about moveable type was that it
didn’t move.
As for exclamation points, perhaps we can think of them this way: they are very lethal, and one shot does the trick. Two, and you’ve just put a bullet in a dead body. For those of you who move into the double-digit zone with exclamation ! points !, I stop reading after exclamation point number 10. The noise is just too loud.
Soon, we’ll look at people who
overuse italics and people WHO WRITE EMAIL IN ALL CAPITALS.
2 Comments:
This post makes me :(
Seriously, though, I think the development of the emoticon in electronic communication came about as a way to remove some of the starkness of the written word. Because words--particularly in the hands of an amateur--will not always convey the feelings of the writer when subtleties like irony and sarcasm are at play. An emoticon can go a small way towards conveying some "other" between the lines meaning.
This is just my theory, of course. I have no proof, just intuition YKWIM ;)
Agreed, I think that was the original intent. When I :-) or :-(, sparingly and appropriately (as you just did), that's great. Even artful. It's the dancing, flirting, disco emoticons, the sort of Disney-fication of the emoticon that is, IMHO :-), just WRONG. (Oops, save that for shouting email!!!!)
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home